14/06/06 23:49 <Mark>

[top-politics] SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.

MG wrote:

-M: ‘all or some’ – Which one? And who would decide? I say have the possibility for delegation for ALL issues, with defaulting to general representitives.

mG: -This is almost as described by AD. The voter decides how to use his power.

-M: My SD2-Smartocracy plan is never pure DD.

The voter can vote for an issue only, but the algorithm will use this voter’s voting power toward representitives.

This is practical because it can yield PageRankable data, despite having only local DD data.(Quality filtering.)

This also is ethical because:
1.The voter isn’t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives anyway, regardless of the system.

The voter is informed that his/her voting power is not going to the top ranked, and is just going to fill gaps in the rank distribution curve.

shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA

-~-~————-~—~——~——————~———-~—~——~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group. To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics ~————-~——~——~——~———~——~———~—~—-

New discussion Write

Answer

16/06/06 13:10 <Magnus>

This also is ethical because:
1.The voter isn’t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives anyway, regardless of the system.

-Talk about selfcontradiciton in one sentence!

-And it is unethical to not being able to decide things yourself if you know that you are able and you are part of the group/community/nation.

-~-~————-~—~——~——————~———-~—~——~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group. To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics ~————-~——~——~——~———~——~———~—~—-
+1 New discussion Answer
- 16/06/06 23:24 <Mark>
  
  M: This also is ethical because:
  
  M: 1.The voter isn’t forced into RD, because (s)he gets representitives
  anyway, regardless of the system.
  
  mG: Talk about selfcontradiciton in one sentence!
  
  -M: No, I already mentioned how even in a DD, the top administrators are representitives.
  
  mG: And it is unethical to not being able to decide things yourself…
  
  -M: Doink! This is still deciding yourself because it is democracy.(I have said this many times before.)
  
  mG:…if you know that you are able and you are part of the group/community/nation.
  
  -M: Yes, one should decide, thats why one should have inputs into the system.
  
  shanti
  Mark, Seattle WA USA
  
  -~-~————-~—~——~——————~———-~—~——~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group. To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics ~————-~——~——~——~———~——~———~—~—-
  +1 New discussion Answer

Parlement

Identity

Filter

Visitors

Subscribers

Highest posts

Latest posts

Links

Blogs

Democracy

Search

[top-politics] Re: Dynamicly Distributed Democracy

[top-politics] SD2-Smartocracy. Never pure DD.